Ringing Forums

I would also question whether a one to one mentor is what is needed or whether small group learning sessions, away from ringing time, — Lucy Chandhial

One to one mentoring already happens, informally or formally, so I’m surprised by the suggestion that it’s not needed.
I’m not aware of group mentoring outside of courses, but it could offer the benefits that come from shared learning. It could also be easier to match the numbers of available mentors to those needing mentoring.
With such obvious benefits I wonder why it is so rare.

do you envisage this operating within a band or across several bands in an area? That would affect the logistics.

What is out there tends to be either too simple and focussed on learning individual methods (ART) or too complicated for the target audience (W. G. Wilson) — John de Overa

There’s also a Learning Curve article: https://cccbr.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/200412.pdf

That sounds like the expectation might be that the existing associations are going to do the delivery. — John de Overa

That doesn’t follow. The societies are just smaller versions of the CC. They are federations that can support, sand do some things better done collectively across an area, but with ringing as it is currently organised, ie in tower bands, they societies are still removed from the coal face.

Does that mean that the idea of the CCCBR as a direct membership organisation has been dropped? — John de Overa

I don’t see why it should. That’s a separate question. Even with a DMO action (as opposed to ideas, resources, support, etc) would still be needed at local level.

i read the article yesterday and the two themes that stood out were:
1 Ringing is dying out. 2 Ringers no longer want to ring for three hours.
1 might attract some who would like to ‘rescue’ ringing from oblivion, but are thee likely to be the sort of recruits we need?
2 could put people off. Those of us who ring peals put up with the downsides because we are hooked on the positive aspects of ringing. But to anyone who hasn’t got to that point the thought of ringing for three hours would be a put off.

The New Ringer’s Book

courses can be part of the solution but not the whole. After attending a course the student needs to return to an environment where he/she can build on and consolidate what’s been learnt.

[reply="John de Overa;d496". Your situation illustrates part of the problem that Ringing 2030 is hoping to address. How much headway it will make is yet to be seen.
There are already places where that statement is true. If Ringing 2030 makes an impact it will be true in more places, which would surely make it worthwhile.
No doubt there will always be some places where it is not true, whatever we do. But I’m not sure watering down the vision statement would help.

a comment against most lines explaining the calculation behind it and details of what the expenditure is for — Jason Carter

That's a sensible suggestion. In many cases at the budgetary stage it will be a wet finger guess, but some indication of the thinking behind it would be helpful.

While it's good not to be too prescriptive mabout 'how' a job should be done, going to the other extreme isn't helpful. Someone new in post needs to know 'what' needs to be done. A definitive list is better than hoping the outgoing office holder will remember to mention everything, or that the incoming office holder will manage to work everything out (in time not to get caught out).
Guild rules are unlikely to have anything like enough detail. Typically they just list what roles there should be, with no indication of who does what.

we have comprehensive job descriptions of branch officers at: https://odg.org.uk/sdb/documents/other/JobDescriptions.pdf
The other place to look is the CC publication ‘Getting it right’, which is about running societies. I can’t find it in the CC Shop so maybe it’s out of print, but there must be some copies around.

most replacements involve a single rope, in which case the best guide is to make it 5he same as the ropes either side, or the average if they are different.

we’ve been using pre stretched polyester for 40 years and had no evidence of garter hole wear.

like to donate “push button” automatic sound contro — Steve Farmer

IT needn't be quite that high tech. We just release four cords in the ringing room, which is just as easy. And we do sometimes close the shutters selectively on the side with houses nearest.

came from the HLF rather than the Association, it seems ironic that it's easier to get funding for that sort of thing from external funding bodies than it is from our own sources. — John de Overa

Indeed. But it merely reflects that the HLF was set up for broad support of cultural activities whereas BRFs were set up with a narrow focus on hardware. Why they were so set up, and the culture behind it is another matter.

I admit I was replying to the point about the Charity Commission, which is a legal point, and I didn't spot the reference to persuading members. Yes, members would need to agree to changes, but in the current climate that is something to work through rather than a reason not to try. The CC has modernised itself. Several societies have also done so, and my own Guild has just embarked on the process. If those changes are possible, so are changes to how we prioritise the use of money.

That would require the agreement of both the association membership and The Charity Commission ... That it will likely be difficult and time consuming. — John de Overa

That doesn't follow. The Charity Comission is primarily concerned with whether a charity spends it's money to achieve charitable purposes. If a charity is not spending its money effectively, and modifying its objects would enable it to do so more effectively (on charitable purposes) then the Commission would be likely to support the change of objects.

the proportion of subs transferred into the BRF can be changed very easily. Also there is case for considering registering the whole society as a charity, where there is then — Roger Booth

The ODG AGM normally votes to make a substantial grant to thee bell fund but this year the trustees said it didn't need any more money,over and aabove its other sources of income, so no donation was made.

I can relate to that. There was a sweet factory behind the house where I grew up, with extractor fans on the roof. If you listened for it you could hear them but otherwise wouldn't notice them. But the sound really wound my father up, to the point where he even went through the process of trying to get rates relief on the grounds of noise interference.

We have had a published policy, available on our website, since 2017, see: Here We are about to consider revising it after a complaint from someone working at home during a weekday morning peal. Previously we considered weekdays would not cause undue disturbance but WFH has changed things so we might consider closing the shutters that face the nearest houses during peals.