Ringing Forums

my suspicion would be that underestimates numbers at the lower levels. — John de Overa

How low do you want to go? Our branch has pretty well 100% membership and the 2017 survey into the state of ringing showed 30% of members were inactive, ie they never or hardly ever rang.

Membership varies. In some places most ringers do belong to their local societies and in others they don't. However I suspect that overall it is high enough for generalisations about society members to apply to ringers in general.

In the main, district RMs don't take on that role. — Phillip George

That might be true, but I didn't claim they all do, I said it was somethimng they ought to be in a position to do. While the 'doing' part of an RM's job might be running the ringing at district events, doing that effectivley entails understanding the needs and capabilities of the participants.

When I was taught my teacher was my mentor and arranged my first QPs and peals — Phillip George

Yes, that's the ideal, and the way we do it. But anyone with such a mentor wouldn't be in the situation being discussed in this thread.

This should not restrict a ringer from making their own decisions — Phillip George

Agreed. That's what we did, with the band almost all firsts in both cases, but such self starters aren't in the position being discussed either.

I didn't make an assumption, I made an assertion about what a branch ringing master 'should' be able to do, because he/she would know the capability of someone, and also of local opportunities.
If ringing in an area is in such poor health that the district RM could not play such a role then it seems unlikely that anyone would have advanced to the point of being ready for a peal.

It might be possible to mine BellBoard to find the average ringing history of first time pealers, e.g. how many QPs had they rung in the year before their first peal. You might then be able to use that to identify potential first-time pealers. — John de Overa

Mining BellBoard is a useful way to gather information about overall patterns (but I think it wouldbe quite hard to find out how many quarters first pealers had rung). You could do it for an individual but the best way to identify individuals who could benefit from the opportunity to ring a peal is by personal contact. A district ringing master should be aware of people who could be encouraged to ring peals, especially those from towers where the local, band doesn't ring peals.

Noise - are there more concerns about disturbing a neighbourhood and is there less acceptance of 3hours of ringing? — Alison Hodge

I doubt that's a factor. Peals only account for a few percent of the hours of ringing each year, and although they are longer stretches they are generally better ringing than a lot of practices and service ringing.

we have a keen youngster whose solution is to organise peals and ask experienced ringers to ting in them.

established peals bands don't routinely give young ringers the opportunity to join them. — Simon Linford

Many established peal bands are retired ringers ringing peals during school hours, which makes it hard to include youngsters except during holidays.

It's nice to see someone trying make constructive suggestions for 'how' to get to a DMO rather than the usual explanations of why it's difficult. I confess I didn't get very far with my attempt 10 years ago (link posted earlier) but as Peter points out things have changed since then, with the Council affiliation fee being (approximately) per ringer rather than per society.
Multiple membership has always been one of the argumants against a per ringer payment but Peter's suggestion of members electing through which society to pay it would solve that. And the concomittent ability to opt out also provides a way to answer the other question thrown under the wheels of a DMO discussion, how many people would sign up.
Doing both of those via affiliated societies would help to solve both problems, and as Peter says could be a first step along the way. With that done there would be a much firmer basis for considering more substantial increases (with the cost borne by willing ringers) and/or for moving to direct membership.
One practical aspect of ringers making an elective payment via a society is that it would increase the admin of the main societies. (Some small specialist societies, whose members all belong to other societies, might find they didn't have to process any, but some probably would.)
For the record my personal view is that if/when the Council moves to direct membership societies should be retained as 'corporate members', so their voice can be heard.

I am fairly sure that if our Church closed, then only a few of the band would go elsewhere to ring, they do it because it is local, and they enjoy it to a level ... predominately it is purely a hobby for the vast majority, — Steve Farmer

That puzzles me slightly. People who do things as a hobby are normally motivated by the activity itself, so I would expect them to look elsewhere if needed. If the response to closure of the local church would be just to give up that suggests limited interest in ringing itself, and doing it more as a duty or service to the church.

I've often had text I decided not to send, which just hung around. I found that deleting the text, including the text in square brackets seems to work.
After you have posted though (plus the 10 minutes) I suspect all you can do is reply to yourself saying pleas ignore.

I've never heard so much rubbish about call change ringing — Robert Brown

The words are used as shorthand for two different things. The Devon call change tradition of high standard, skilful ringing of call changes, raising and lowering is one of them. The other is the widespread use of call changes elsewhere by unskillful ringers, and the way they are taught

letting people learn a difficult skill one way — John de Overa

That's not quite true. Ringing is an activity that requires several skills to do well, but for which a smaller, different set of skills can be used to do in a limited way, not very well. The fault is not teaching the right skills in the first place.

that's what I assume. So is the stubble field within sight of it, or is that edited?

I've a feeling the question has been asked before but I can't remember the answer.

Wikipedia credits Nick Mason with "drums, percussion, church bell" so presumably he rang it, though whether on location in a tower or a small one in the studio who knows.
A probably easier question - Which cathedral is visible on the horizon?

there definitely is a barrier to getting into method ringing at all — Simon Linford

Yes, several factors combine, the most fundamental of which is not about the methods themselves but the failure to develop the underlying skills on which method ringing relies. Sadly many people struggling to ring methods have already been allowed, and encouraged, to develop habits that make it hard to retrofit the missing skills.

'2030' is the wrong year for something needed now! Assumes no need to do anything before an event in 2030 — Ken Webb

I think that is a misguided comment. Ringing 2030 is not about what to do 'in' 2030 it is about things to achieve 'by' 2030 That is still quite close, and glevel of ambition things do need to be started 'now' (or in fact last year, which is when they actually started - there was a public session on it during the Council weekend last September).

That seems a fair analysis. Voting members is probably close to the 'natural justice intent' of the rules. I suspect the rational for including (resident) members who are exempt from the sub in societies with an annual subscription was that they would be a tiny minority. I'm sure no society would include the unkown number of NRLRMs who are still alive and ringing.

that's a lot of free memberships. It means YACR is losing £1920 per annum in subs already, and I assume the membership is getting older so the subscription income will reduce further in future.

in Yorkshire, Life Members who are not required to pay an annual subscription.... If either of these categories are included in the counts of membership, then the effect of the current proposals - the extra cost per paying-member is even greater than the 20p to 40p or 20p to £1 multipliers. — PeterScott

If you have a significant number of life members the fact that they don't pay the £12 sub seems a much bigger problem than whether the society pays a (much smaller) affiliation fee for them.

Many years ago ODG realised that giving free membership to members over 65 was not sustainable as the membership ages so we abolished it. All members now pay the same, but at £10 per year I doubt it is driving many pensdioners into hardship.