Ringing Forums

Both links go to a six bell quarter peal which looks like it was rung by six ringers on tower bells so I think the first link is missing?
I guess @Graham John can comment on how the method naming rules are supervised.

The link should have been

https://bb.ringingworld.co.uk/view.php?id=1359821

Ive noted that there are now some marked as provisionally named but even that can br misunderstood and doesnt stop anyone ringing the mwthod and naming it something else.

The 6th bell method would be difficult to get an extent but could be rung with another method that has a double dodge in 34

The Central Council’s Technical & Taxonomy Workgroup maintains the CCCBR Methods Library in accordance with the Framework for Method Ringing, which was implemented on 24 February 2019. Since that date, methods are only added to the Library if they meet the naming requirements set out in section 5E. These requirements were updated on 26 January 2022, including the addition of the “all human ringers” rule.

The quarter of VE Surprise Major cited was rung on 8 May 2020, so that method was accepted before the introduction of the all‑human‑ringers requirement, as were a small number of others.

There are at least 64 methods that have been named since 2019 but have not been added to the CCCBR Methods Library at methods.cccbr.org.uk because the performances did not qualify for inclusion under section 5E. However, I have added those methods to Complib in a Provisional Library, noting that they have no official standing. Brown Bear Alliance Minor, rung this month, is one such example (as it was rung to a false touch).