Ringing Forums

Stella Bianco

Please remind me what this is?
As a call change band, we ring a lot of fun exercises on practice night.

Alison Hodge

I think it may be 3216549870

James Ramsbottom

Correct - 3216549870

David Struckett

It sounds: did-er-ly, diderly, diderly, pom!

Stella Bianco

Thanks and there's a nice article "New call changes to try on eight bells" by John Pusey on page 979 of the current issue of the RW.

Simon Linford

I have always called this by getting 987 in position first, then 654, and finally 321. Then I tend to just reverse it. My daughter Charlie called it last week and she moved just one bell in each group then did the same in the next group and the next, so b to c in each group of three, then a to c in each group, then a to b. Which just shows that if you think about things with a fresh mind it can be quite different.

PeterScott

321456987
is an interesting row on the 'return trip',
from there, fun to call the bells home quickly, one call each handstroke:

"3to2(lead), 9to8"; (two pairs swap at the same time)
"3to1, 9to7"
"Rounds next time"

Embee Dee

Care needs to be taken to ring Rollercoaster well! In particular, 6 must be close to 1, and 9 close to 4. Too often the bigger bells are slow over the smaller ones, causing the row to separate into three groups of three bells.

John Hutchinson

I believe there's a comparable change on twelve 32147658E09T which produced a similar effect.

Ringing Forums

Roller Coaster

Welcome to your Ringing Forums!

Categories

More Discussions